The DeKalb County School Desegregation Case Files are divided into four series: I. Common subjects include attendance boundaries, the DeKalb County Schools policies and procedures, enrollment numbers of students including race, the quality of education, and statistics about teachers and staff. The majority of the files are pleadings, exhibits, and data about the school system, as well as other kinds of legal documents, research, and correspondence. The DeKalb County School Desegregation Case Files document the progression of the case from the perspective of the defendants, the demographic makeup of students and to a lesser extent all of DeKalb County during this period, and the evolution of school desegregation case law. DeKalb County Schools were declared integrated and therefore the school board no longer required judicial supervision. In 1996 the case was heard again in the District Court, which ordered the final dismissal of the case in 1997. The case was then sent back to the 11th Circuit, and from them to the District Court, for review based on this ruling. Instead, the court could withdraw judicial supervision in areas of compliance while retaining supervision in areas of noncompliance. Supreme Court in 1992, which reversed the 11th Circuit Court's holding that judicial supervision could not be withdrawn incrementally. This ruling was appealed to the 11th Circuit in 1989, which reversed the decision and required additional student assignments, as well as requiring the school board to remain under court supervision until integration was achieved. The District Court re-evaluated the case in 1988 and found that DeKalb County had not yet been completely integrated but declined to impose additional duties on the school board around student assignment. The 11th Circuit Court ruled in 1985 that any of the school's expansion plans had to be implemented in a way that "furthers desegregation and helps eliminate the effects of the previous dual school system" and sent the case back to the District Court to evaluate the "segregative" effects of the school board's expansion plan. The District Court ruled that the expansion was permitted because the school board's actions were not motivated by discriminatory intent, but their decision was overturned on appeal to the 11th Circuit Court, which had been formed from a portion of the 5th Circuit in 1981. In 1984, the plaintiffs filed an appeal with the District Court over plans to build a new high school, claiming this was to avoid the reassignment of white students to predominantly black schools. Cherry was complete, but litigation over other aspects of desegregation continued under the names Freeman v. With that ruling, litigation under Pitts v. The plaintiffs unsuccessfully challenged a portion of the plan in the 5th Circuit Court in 1979 for not requiring the school district to provide transportation for students attending schools outside of their neighborhood. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia imposed a desegregation plan upon the DeKalb schools and retained authority to oversee the implementation of the plan. The DeKalb schools were represented by the law firm Weekes & Candler. Litigation in DeKalb County, Georgia over school desegregation began in 1968 with the filing of a class action lawsuit against the DeKalb County Board of Education to end the practice of racial segregation ( Pitts v. The files document the progression of the case from the perspective of the defendants, the demographic makeup of students and to a lesser extent all of DeKalb County during this period, and the evolution of school desegregation case law. Russell Library for Political Research and StudiesĪbstract: The DeKalb County School Desegregation Case Files document the work of the law firm Weekes & Candler defending the DeKalb County Schools in litigation over school desegregation from 1968 to 1997. (62.25 linear feet and 9 audiovisual items) Title: DeKalb County School Desegregation Case Files DeKalb County School Desegregation Case Files
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |